![]() Never having to save is so freeing! That might be my number one requirement - any other software do that? No jarring "Save changes?", no decisions about saving over the original, creating a copy, saving over a previously edited copy, etc. So, you do your editing and just move on to the next one. It never modifies your original (I think it secretly does when you do retouching, but it's seamless and it keeps your original safely elsewhere). When using Picasa, you never have to save. However, it really highlighted one of my favorite features of Picasa from my original post: Not really as easy to use, but I could get there. I downloaded the ACDSee trial version and it's not bad. I always thought Picasa was just too good, so good that Google migrates its features to Google Photos (subscriptions) and discontinued it. And this contradicts with suggestions in (1). There was just a long thread about it, and it seems digiKam gets high vote for organization. For me, Lightroom (Cloud) is easy, but not Lightroom Classic because of its UI.īut for a free and highly rated image editing app, would you mind trying Paint.NET, or the not-so-expensive-when-discounted Photoshop Elements? But you can search for free/open source programs first. I do not think there is an exact drop-in replacement for Picasa. Unless the picture is really important, I just want to spend less than a minute fixing it - often just auto contrast and crop. ![]() I'm the family photographer for holidays, so I'll take a bunch of shots, quick edit on Picasa (fix lighting, contrast, minor retouching, cropping) and upload to some site where the subjects can use for sharing or holiday cards or whatever. I take more when I'm on vacation, but I don't usually edit those. What kind of photographer am I? I usually take pictures of people, mostly family members, mostly for holidays. Layers, complicated selection tools (I already have the GIMP if I want get serious) Haven't had the patience for that in a long time.Ģ. Picasa loads immediately and any effects are super fast.ġ. I can always do this manually if necessary (I have to now for Picasa because it has lost its connection to the various APIs).ģ, Quick and lightweight. Easy uploading, sharing, and photo ordering. I can already do this with Google Photos, and use that to find the original if necessary, but I'd like it better if it were built inĢ. Face tracking, so I can put names to faces. Free or relatively cheap - say, $100 or less. That way, I don't have originals and edited copies cluttering up the hard drive.ĥ. Even better if it never touches the originals, but just keeps track of your changes, the way Picasa does. Quick retouching - removing blemishes on Picasa is really easy and intuitive - click on the blemish, click on something that looks similar, and you're doneĤ. Photo organization - can be as simple as keeping track of all my photos, so I don't have to find them myself on the driveģ. Ease of use and easy of editing (love the quick fix buttons on Picasa)Ģ. But, this machine can't get upgraded to Windows 11 (something to do with the boot loader), so someday, I'll have to give up on Picasa.ġ. I've managed to keep Picasa on my main computer all these years by transferring over my whole operating system when I build a new machine.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |